Compare AI models: Kimi K2.6 vs Hy4 preview

Kimi K2.6MoonshotHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
Hy4 previewTencentHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details

ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use

Normalized model capability scores
Model	Reasoning	Coding	Cost efficiency	Context window	Multimodal	Tool use
Kimi K2.6	50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark	78/100	36/100	63/100	50/100	27/100
Hy4 preview	50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark	50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder	41/100	87/100	0/100	50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark

Overview

Author

Moonshot

Tencent

Context length

262K

Reasoning

True

Input modalities

Text, Image, Video

Text

Output modalities

Text

Providers

Moonshot

Tencent

Pricing

Input

$0.65/ 1M

$0.75/ 1M

Output

$3.41/ 1M

$2.25/ 1M

Cached input

$0.15/ 1M

$0.04/ 1M

MomentumLast 2 mo

Unique users

72K

51K

Completed sessions

241,327

127,471

Token share

0.01%

0.02%

Tokens

123B-81%

280B+197%

SEP 2OCT 27

RetentionWeek 1

Returning users

56.6%2.7K user-weeks

51.2%1.5K user-weeks

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.

Nearby alternativeKimi K2.6 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructKimi K2.6Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B Instruct Nearby alternativeHy4 preview vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructHy4 previewDracarys Llama 3.1 70B Instruct Related comparisonKimi K2.6 vs Jamba MiniKimi K2.6Jamba Mini Related comparisonHy4 preview vs Jamba MiniHy4 previewJamba Mini