Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GPT-4o mini
- DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek
- GPT-4o miniOpenAIHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | 100/100 | 100/100 | 51/100 | 81/100 | 33/100 | 92/100 |
| GPT-4o mini | 0/100 — Reasoning not supported | 11/100 | 69/100 | 24/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
128K
Reasoning
True
False
Input modalities
Text, Image
Text, Image, Pdf
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.50/ 1M
$0.15/ 1M
Output
$1.50/ 1M
$0.60/ 1M
Cached input
$0.13/ 1M
Unknown
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
3.9M
0
Completed sessions
103,118,617
18
Token share
37.2%
0%
Tokens
445T+100%
00%
SEP 2OCT 27
No trend data
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
69.2%413K user-weeks
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructDeepSeek V4.1 Flash·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeGPT-4o mini vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructGPT-4o mini·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Jamba MiniDeepSeek V4.1 Flash·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonGPT-4o mini vs Jamba MiniGPT-4o mini·Jamba Mini